Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 01:27

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s next?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Eyeglasses With Built-In Hearing Aids: This Just Makes Sense - WSJ
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Senators get ready to roll out a new crypto bill - Politico
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
10 Video Game Companions Everyone Hated At First (But Ended Up Loving) - WhatCulture.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
T.J. Oshie, the Caps’ beloved ‘warrior,’ announces his NHL retirement - The Washington Post
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What should I do if a girl whom I love asks me to be her friend?